CHRONOTOPIC ORGANIZATION OF THE SHORT-STORY BY NIKOLAI GOGOL “ST. JOHN'S EVE”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of research is the comprehensive analysis of spatio-temporal relations in the short-story by N. V. Gogol "St.John's Eve", the categories of literary time and literary space as plot-forming and character-creative characteristics and as important structural elements of the romantic worldbuilding of Gogol's short-story.The subject of investigation is spatio-temporal worldbuilding of Gogol's short-story "St.John's Eve".The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are the works of S. D. Abramovich, M. M. Bakhtin, N. G. Gey, A. B. Yesin, V. Ya.Zvinyatskovsky, Yu.M. Lotman, L. A. Sofronova, V. E. Halizev, A. Ya.Esalnek and others.The article states that the chronotope in this short-story has heterogeneous and combined character, and temporal and spatial movements are carried out thanks to the image of the narrator.The article discusses real/irreal space and story-line, calendar, abstract and historical time; inn chronotope and the spatial demoniacal vertical framework, along the axis of which the plot action unfolds.In Gogolian narrative both the image of the fern and the treasure hunting motive are inextricably bound up with the spatial demoniacal vertical framework.The dream motive is considered as the author's technique for the transition of a character from irreal time and space into real.Particular attention is paid to the subjective "time of the character" (or the so-called "individualization of time") -in other words to the emotional and psychological perception of the time of narration by Petrus Bezrodnyi.Thus, the night is considered in the article as the time of taking life-changing steps, the time of doubts, fear and internal struggle
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".