Deep Artificial Noise: Deep Learning-Based Precoding Optimization for Artificial Noise Scheme
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we consider a secure precoding optimization problem for the artificial noise (AN) scheme in multiple-input single-output (MISO) wiretap channels. In previous researches (Lin et al., 2013), it was proved that the generalized AN scheme which allows some portion of AN signal to be injected to the legitimate receiver's channel is the optimal precoding scheme for MISO wiretap channels. However, the optimality is valid only under some ideal assumptions such as perfect channel estimation and spatially uncorrelated channels. To break through this limitation, in this paper, we propose a novel deep neural network (DNN)-based secure precoding scheme, called the deep AN scheme. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the deep AN scheme is the first secure precoding scheme which exploits a DNN to jointly design and optimize the precoders for the information signal and the AN signal. From the numerical experiments, it is demonstrated that the proposed deep AN scheme outperforms the generalized AN scheme under various practical wireless environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it