MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000438050 · doi:10.36584/cjic.2019.005

Urine collection practices in a small rural hospital: Evaluation of alignment with antimicrobial stewardship guidelines

2019· article· en· W3000438050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Infection Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinalysisMedicineUrineAntimicrobial stewardshipConcordanceUrinary systemPopulationAsymptomaticInternal medicineIntensive care medicineEnvironmental healthAntibioticsAntibiotic resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The diagnosis of a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) can be challenging among elderly patients, resulting in an increased risk for specimen collection and treatment of asymptomatic patients. The Vancouver Coastal Health Authority’s Antimicrobial Stewardship Guidelines provide a systematic approach to support clinicians in the assessment and treatment of UTIs. The purpose of this quality review was to evaluate if urine collection practices were in alignment with the guidelines. Methods: The review involved a retrospective examination of all urine specimens collected from medical and surgical patients of a small rural hospital from September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016. A survey of staff was also conducted to evaluate the interdisciplinary team’s knowledge of urine collection and interpretation and to assess concordance with the guidelines. Results: 318 urine cultures were reviewed, of which only 78 (24.5%) met microbiologic criteria and were considered to be positive cultures. A large proportion of samples resulted in mixed organisms. There was a highly statistically significant relationship between urinalysis and a positive culture (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.0001). A positive urine culture (> 100 million CFU/L) was statistically significantly more likely to be observed when there was a positive urinalysis. Conclusions: Older adults represent a large and growing population of hospitalized patients. Diagnosis of a symptomatic UTI in the elderly can pose challenges. Urine cultures are frequently obtained and a high proportion sent for culturing with missing or negative urinalysis. Urinalysis results are pertinent in the diagnosis of a UTI as there is correlation between a positive urinalysis and a positive urine culture. Adoption of a systematic approach in the management of UTIs would result in consistent and appropriate assessment and treatment of UTIs for elderly patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it