MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000446439 · doi:10.11648/j.ajpn.20200801.11

A Case of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Presenting as Vascular Parkinsonism

2020· article· en· W3000446439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Talal Meshal Alumri, Rawan Zeinelabdein Mahgoub, Alawi A. Al‐Attas

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParkinsonismMedicineNormal pressure hydrocephalusGait DisturbanceHydrocephalusVentriculomegalyUrinary incontinenceMagnetic resonance imagingShuntingDementiaNeurological examinationLateral ventriclesCardiologySurgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineRadiologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is the most common form of hydrocephalus in adults. It is characterized by dilated ventricles and the Hakim triad, which consists of gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence. The gold standard treatment for iNPH is shunting, but frequent lumbar punctures (LPs) are helpful for diagnosis and predicting shunting outcome and is considered the treatment of choice when shunting is not available. One condition with similar presentation to iNPH is Vascular parkinsonism (VP), which is characterized by an established relationship between cerebrovascular diseases and the clinical symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). VP patients usually present with lower-body parkinsonism, including impaired gait, instability, difficulty with maintaining gait, and frequent episodes of freezing. VP is managed by levodopa followed by transcranial magnetic stimulation then vitamin D. LPs are less effective for VP than iNPH. Our case report shows that iNPH may be misdiagnosed with VP. Here we present a case of a 71-year-old male with a history of previous lacunar strokes who was admitted for possible vascular parkinsonism. Eight months prior to coming to the hospital, he developed gait disturbances; and four months later, he developed urinary symptoms. Upon examination, his gait initiation was hesitant, wide-based, and magnetic with decreased arm swing. The patient scored 20 out of 30 points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The only cranial nerve involvement was a diminished gag reflex. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed symmetrically enlarged ventricles with mildly dilated sulci. Routine laboratory testing was normal. Two months of treatment with levodopa did not improve his symptoms but draining 50 mL of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has dramatically improved his gait. A final diagnosis of iNPH was therefore made. To conclude, iNPH and VP are two manageable diseases but the differential diagnosis between them is particularly challenging due to similar clinical and neuroradiological features. We suggest further studies to establish supporting guidelines by using neuroradiological or neurophysiological biomarkers which may help physicians in ameliorate diagnostic accuracy between the two entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207