Ionizing radiation treatment as an innovative process approach in food storage technology for modern agriculture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The article presents the results of the identification of chilled imported rainbow trout to establish the fact of irradiation in the study of bone tissue by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) on a modern domestic EPR X-band spectrometer of Labrador Expert brand. It was established that imported trout was previously treated with ionizing radiation, and information on the processing method in violation of regulatory requirements was not communicated to consumers. Implementation of an innovative process approach when choosing a technology for processing food products with ionizing radiation allows us to provide high organoleptic characteristics during storage for up to 15 days, maintaining freshness indicators (acid number, peroxide number) at the normal level and prolonging shelf life. Proven processing efficiencies to ensure microbiological safety. The results are of practical and methodological importance for the implementation of radiobiological control of previously irradiated food products and the justification of the possibility of using ionizing radiation in the technological process at the enterprises of the agro-industrial complex to extend shelf life based on an innovative process approach to the choice of storage technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".