MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000468333 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2019.12.008

Commentary: Veins grafts reversibly adapt to the arterial circulation

2020· editorial· en· W3000468333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alison F. Ward, Richard Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArteryMedicineCardiologyAnastomosisBypass graftingVeinInternal medicineCoronary circulationClinical significanceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the criterion standard for treatment of complex multivessel coronary artery disease, but its long-term success and survival benefit to the patient depend on graft patency. Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are commonly used for multivessel CABG, but they have a patency rate of only 50% at 10 years.1,2 Is the poor patency rate of SVGs due to harvesting technique, anastomotic factors, or the vascular biology of the conduit itself?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0400.043
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207