MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000498499 · doi:10.1002/acn3.50957

Genome sequencing in persistently unsolved white matter disorders

2020· article· en· W3000498499 on OpenAlexafffund
Guy Helman, Bryan R. Lajoie, Joanna Crawford, Asako Takanohashi, Marzena Walkiewicz, Egor Dolzhenko, Andrew M. Gross, Vladimir G. Gainullin, Stephen J. Bent, Emma M. Jenkinson, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Hans R. Waterham, Imen Dorboz, Enrico Bertini, Noriko Miyake, Nicole I. Wolf, Truus E. M. Abbink, Susan M. Kirwin, Christina Tan, Grace M. Hobson, Long Guo, Shiro Ikegawa, Amy Pizzino, Johanna Schmidt, Geneviève Bernard, Raphael Schiffmann, Marjo S. van der Knaap, Cas Simons, Ryan J. Taft, Adeline Vanderver

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilState Government of VictoriaMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMedical Research CouncilChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
KeywordsMedicineGenomeComputational biologyDNA sequencingWhite (mutation)Whole genome sequencingGeneticsDNABiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic white matter disorders have heterogeneous etiologies and overlapping clinical presentations. We performed a study of the diagnostic efficacy of genome sequencing in 41 unsolved cases with prior exome sequencing, resolving an additional 14 from an historical cohort (n = 191). Reanalysis in the context of novel disease-associated genes and improved variant curation and annotation resolved 64% of cases. The remaining diagnoses were directly attributable to genome sequencing, including cases with small and large copy number variants (CNVs) and variants in deep intronic and technically difficult regions. Genome sequencing, in combination with other methodologies, achieved a diagnostic yield of 85% in this retrospective cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Clinical and Translational NeurologySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207