MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adolescents in Individualistic Cultures

2020· other· en· W3000506535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin R. Bush, Anthony G. James

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollectivismIndividualismEthnic groupSocial psychologySocioeconomic statusPsychologyCultural diversityDevelopmental psychologySociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adolescence is an important development period for humans across the globe. Biologically this time period is full of physical, hormonal, and cognitive changes. The social contexts in which adolescents are embedded (e.g., racial/ethnic, cultural, socioeconomic, and political) shape the social experiences (parent–adolescent relationship, school experience, peer relationships) during development as these biological changes unfold within each adolescent's unique socioecological niche. Adolescents in Western countries (e.g., Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom) are typically more influenced by individualistic values of independence than by collectivistic values of interdependence, and will prioritize individual achievement over group achievement. However, culture does not exist within a vacuum, and most countries, even those with high of levels of individualism on average, are not absent of collectivistic values. In fact, many cultural groups within individualistic countries and cultures focus much more on collectivistic values, especially immigrant groups with strong ties to their home or ancestral collectivistic culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent DevelopmentSame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207