mCUTE: A Model-Level Concolic Unit Testing Engine for UML State Machines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model Driven Engineering (MDE) techniques raise the level of abstraction at which developers construct software. However, modern cyber-physical systems are becoming more prevalent and complex and hence software models that represent the structure and behavior of such systems still tend to be large and complex. These models may have numerous if not infinite possible behaviors, with complex communications between their components. Appropriate software testing techniques to generate test cases with high coverage rate to put these systems to test at the model-level (without the need to understand the underlying code generator or refer to the generated code) are therefore important. Concolic testing, a hybrid testing technique that benefits from both concrete and symbolic execution, gains a high execution coverage and is used extensively in the industry for program testing but not for software models. In this paper, we present a novel technique and its tool mCUTE1, an open source 2 model-level concolic testing engine. We describe the implementation of our tool in the context of Papyrus-RT, an open source Model Driven Engineering (MDE) tool based on UML-RT, and report the results of validating our tool using a set of benchmark models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it