MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000555860 · doi:10.1080/10408444.2019.1694861

Tramadol and the occurrence of seizures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019· review· en· W3000555860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samaneh Nakhaee, Alireza Amirabadizadeh, Jeffrey Brent, Ebrahim Miri‐Moghaddam, Mohsen Foadoddini, Khadijeh Farrokhfall, Mehran Hosseini, Mohammad Abdollahı, Omid Mehrpour

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Toxicology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTramadolMedicineMeta-analysisOdds ratioOpioidEpilepsyCohort studyFunnel plotAnesthesiaInternal medicinePublication biasAnalgesicPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tramadol is a synthetic opioid which is commonly used around the world to relieve moderate to severe pain. One of the serious possible complications of its use is seizures. The present study aims to investigate and summarize the studies related to tramadol and occurrences of seizures after tramadol use and factors influencing these seizures.Methodology: Our systematic review is compliant with PRISMA guidelines. Two researchers systematically searched PubMed/Medline, Web of Sciences, and Scopus. Cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies, and clinical trials. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale After article quality assessment, a fixed or random model, as appropriate, was used to pool the results in a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed with using I-square and Q-test. Forest plots demonstrating the point and pooled estimates were drawn.Results: A total of 51 articles with total sample size of 101 770 patients were included. The results showed that seizure event rate in the subgroups of tramadol poisoning, therapeutic dosage of tramadol, and tramadol abusers was 38% (95% CI: 27–49%), 3% (95% CI: 2–3%), 37% (95% CI: 12–62%), respectively. Tramadol dose was significantly higher in the patients with seizures than those without (mean differences: 0.82, CI 95%: 0.17–1.46). The odds for occurrence of seizures were significantly associated with male gender (pooled OR: 2.24, CI 95%: 1.80–2.77). Naloxone administration was not associated to the occurrence of seizures (pooled OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.15–1.49).Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the occurrence of seizures in patients exposed to tramadol are dose-dependent and related to male gender, but not related to naloxone administration. Given that, most of the evidence derives from studies utilizing a cross-sectional design, the association of tramadol with seizures should not be considered to be definitively established

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.041
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.358
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in ToxicologySame topicVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaFrench-language works237,207