MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000636903 · doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.330039

Yaşam Çözümlemesinde Buckley-James Modeli

2019· article· tr· W3000636903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlphanumeric Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProportional hazards modelMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yaşam çözümlemesinde en yaygın kullanılan model Cox orantılı tehlikeler modelidir. Cox orantılı tehlikeler modeline alternatif olarak Buckley-James modeli kullanılabilir. Buckley-James modeli yaşam süresinin beklenen değerinin hesaplanmasına odaklı iken Cox orantılı tehlikeler modeli başarısız olaylar üzerinde açıklayıcı değişkenlerin göreli etkilerine odaklıdır. Bu çalışmada, Buckley-James modeli incelenmiş ve meme kanseri verilerine uygulanmıştır. Bu model kullanılarak meme kanserinde yaşam süresini etkileyen risk faktörleri belirlenmiştir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it