MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000659890 · doi:10.7202/1066153ar

Testing à l'embauche des Québécoises et Québécois d'origine maghrébine à Québec

2019· article· fr· W3000659890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un testing mené dans la région métropolitaine de Québec, de mars à juillet 2017, a montré que tous les candidats ne sont pas sur un pied d’égalité dans l’accès à l’emploi. L’étude a généré l’envoi de quelque 404 CV en réponse à 202 offres d’emplois hautement qualifiés en administration. À candidature équivalente, les Québécoises et les Québécois d’origine maghrébine ont subi un taux net de discrimination de 49 %, leur candidature ayant été ignorée près d’une fois sur deux sur une base potentiellement discriminatoire. Innovant avec un premier « test intersectionnel », ce testing n’a toutefois pas permis de démontrer que la variable du genre soit un facteur de discrimination significatif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it