MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

¨El hegemonismo de la administración de Donald Trump: un golpe al multilateralismo¨

2018· article· es· W3000659927 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María Fernanda Benítez Pena, Karla Rosa Ruiz Ortiz

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el marco de la concepción chovinista y antiglobalizadora “America first”, Donald Trump avanza con la imposición de un modelo de tratados bilaterales donde prevalecen los intereses propios de EEUU. Washington desbarata los acuerdos internacionales y, con ello, el multilateralismo económico tejido pacientemente por las organizaciones intergubernamentales desde el fin de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. En virtud del tamaño de la economía estadounidense y de su fuerte integración en Norteamérica, si es el primer eslabón que se rompe, acabará afectando al resto del sistema internacional, con consecuencias irreversibles para el mismo, tales como la caída de la actividad económica, el aumento de los precios y el empobrecimiento. Por consiguiente, es fundamental mantener un entorno de acuerdos multilaterales entre las principales economías del mundo y así crear un orden internacional estable que disminuya las relaciones de poder, ponga freno a la carrera armamentista y elimine los conflictos internacionales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcienciaDigitalSame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207