MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000704760 · doi:10.1097/wad.0000000000000372

Applying the Alzheimer Disease ATN Diagnostic Framework in Atypical Dementia

2020· article· en· W3000704760 on OpenAlexaff
Clark Funnell, Howard Feldman, Ian R. Mackenzie, Mari L. DeMarco

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalProvidence Health CareVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementia with Lewy bodiesDementiaMedicineDiseaseAlzheimer's diseasePathologyCerebrospinal fluidCognitive declineDegenerative diseaseAmyloid (mycology)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid-β and tau have been validated for the antemortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) and are included in the AT(N) research framework for AD. Recently, an AT(N) CSF profile has been described for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), a disorder which is difficult to distinguish clinically from AD, particularly early in the disease course. Herein we describe a 71-year old male who presented with an atypical dementia syndrome including years of stability after an initial abrupt decline, marked visuospatial dysfunction, and relative sparing of memory. CSF biomarkers combined with the pattern of cognitive symptoms made AD unlikely and were consistent with DLB. This classification was confirmed clinically, with the emergence of classic DLB symptoms, and at postmortem pathologic examination. This case highlights the role for AD CSF biomarkers in facilitating earlier diagnosis of non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative dementias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer Disease & Associated DisordersSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207