Comportamiento isotrópico a altas presiones de arenas de relave con finos no plásticos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an experimental study that examines the isotropic triaxial behaviour of tailings sands in a wide range of pressures from 10 kPa to 5 MPa, varying the fine content of the tested samples. The results suggest that the presence and quantity of fines have influence in the behaviour: there is an increase in the compressibility of tailings sands deposited in a loose state, generating significant changes in the void ratio when confined throughout the range of pressures studied. In addition, it is observed that the effect of the fines in the compressibility decreases with the decrease of the void ratio, even exhibiting stiffening of the sample for the densest conditions of confection. Results of imaging performed post-test on the material suggest that the tailings sand exhibits a slight breakage of its angular edges when consolidated at high pressures. For low void ratios, differences in fines content of up to 4% are observed for clean sand. This difference decreases when the fine content of the sand increases, suggesting that the presence of fines contributes to the stability of the granular structure, redistributing the interparticle stresses, decreasing the level of breakage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".