MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000805212 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13735

Career Decision Self-Efficacy and Career Decision Distress: The Role of Occupational Engagement, Grit, and Future Work Self Salience Among Recent University Graduates

2019· dissertation· en· W3000805212 on OpenAlexaff
Rene Guardado

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalience (neuroscience)GritPsychologyWork engagementCareer counselingDistressCareer developmentSocial psychologyWork (physics)Applied psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive career decision-making processes play a pivotal role in the ways that young adults explore and develop their careers and form career identities. The career development literature extols the benefits of active involvement in the management and monitoring of career decisions before and during the transition from school to work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationFrench-language works237,207