MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000895635

PENERAPAN METODE SAW UNTUK MENENTUKAN DUGAAN REJECT BAN VULKANISIR BERDASARKAN KONDISI GEMBUNG DALAM

2019· article· id· W3000895635 on OpenAlexaff
Lahmudin Sipahutar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreadProduction (economics)Work (physics)Process (computing)EngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringNatural rubberMaterials scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A company engaged in tire retreading is a company whose work process involves recycling worn tires by giving tire tread on the tire surface without changing the shape or brand on the base tire. During the production process there is tire damage. If there is a tire damage in the production process, then some of the vulcanized tires are not subject to production costs by the company. This certainly can make a loss for the company. Because a decision support system is needed to determine the dugaaned tire that must be rejected before recycling. The decision support system method suitable for this problem is the SAW Method with its web-based application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207