MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000951697 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105170

Single-trial fMRI activation maps measured during the InterTVA event-related voice localizer. A data set ready for inter-subject pattern analysis

2020· article· en· W3000951697 on OpenAlexaff
Virginia Aglieri, Bastien Cagna, Pascal Belin, Sylvain Takerkart

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheAix-Marseille Université
KeywordsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingComputer scienceNeuroimagingSet (abstract data type)Data setGeneralizationCognitionArtificial intelligenceMultivariate statisticsPerceptionPattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionMachine learningPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of functional neuroimaging data has emerged as a key tool for studying the cognitive architecture of the human brain. At the group level, we have recently demonstrated the advantages of an under-exploited scheme that consists in training a machine learning model on data from a set of subjects and evaluating its generalization ability on data from unseen subjects (see Inter-subject pattern analysis: A straightforward and powerful scheme for group-level MVPA [1]). We here provide a data set that is fully ready to perform inter-subject pattern analysis, which includes 5616 single-trial brain activation maps recorded in 39 participants who were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a voice localizer paradigm. This data set should therefore reveal valuable for data scientists developing brain decoding algorithms as well as cognitive neuroscientists interested in voice perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207