MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000984751 · doi:10.4000/books.pufr.18231

Chapitre 5. Accompagner l’insertion des enseignants débutants au travers de dynamiques transactionnelles de reconnaissance

2016· book-chapter· fr· W3000984751 on OpenAlexaff
Karine Dejean

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsCentrale des Syndicats du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Belgique francophone (Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles de Belgique), un nombre important d’enseignants quitte le métier pendant les cinq premières années (Delvaux et al., 2013). Les recherches qui ont étudié cette phase spécifique de la carrière enseignante constatent que les premières expériences dans la fonction sont associées à des vécus émotionnels intenses et parfois contradictoires qui peuvent être à l’origine de difficultés d’insertion et de l’intention de quitter le métier. L’objet de...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooksSame topicTransactional Analysis in PsychotherapyFrench-language works237,207