MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001208339 · doi:10.36584/cjic.2019.020

The effect of timing of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis in controlling influenza B outbreaks in long-term care facilities in Manitoba, Canada, 2017-2018: A retrospective cohort study

2020· article· en· W3001208339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Infection Control · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOseltamivirChemoprophylaxisMedicineOutbreakRetrospective cohort studyOdds ratioOddsCohortCohort studyPediatricsInternal medicineEmergency medicineVirologyLogistic regressionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A retrospective cohort study (n=8) was used to examine the effect of the timing of administration of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis for the control of influenza B outbreaks among residents in long-term care facilities in Manitoba, Canada during the 2017-2018 influenza season. Delay of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis was associated with increased odds of influenza-like illness in both univariate and multivariable analyses with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.60) per day for influenza B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it