Stratégies adaptatives associées à la résilience familiale : une recension des écrits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette recension des écrits est d’apporter une réponse à la question : quelles sont les stratégies adaptatives favorisant la résilience sur le plan familial ? Quatorze stratégies adaptatives qui favorisent la résilience familiale ont été identifiées dans la littérature scientifique. Elles reposent sur des facteurs de protection qui agissent sur le plan de la structure familiale, des rapports familiaux et des ressources économiques et sociales. Les stratégies adaptatives recensées offrent un bon point de départ pour le développement d’interventions auprès des familles à risque d’être peu ou pas résilientes. Quant à celles qui présentent de bons indicateurs de résilience, l’intervention sociale doit viser à consolider et maintenir à long terme les facteurs de protection facilitant des stratégies adaptatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".