MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3001305758 · doi:10.1101/2020.01.27.921437

Prior selection prevents the loss of an ecosystem cycle during acidification

2020· preprint· en· W3001305758 on OpenAlexafffund
Sofia J. van Moorsel, Justin N. Marleau, Jorge Octavio Negrín Dastis, Charles Bazerghi, Vincent Fugère, Owen L. Petchey, Andrew Gonzalez

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMcGill University
FundersLiber Ero FoundationUniversität ZürichSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMesocosmEcosystemOcean acidificationEnvironmental scienceDiurnal temperature variationPhotosynthesisEcologyPrimary productionAquatic ecosystemAlgaeEnvironmental chemistryBiologyAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeChemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ecosystem processes vary temporally due to variation in environmental variables, such as when diurnal variation in sunlight causes diurnal cycles in net primary production. This variability can be characterized by its frequency and amplitude, used to define “normal” functioning of an ecosystem. Relatively little research has addressed how normal modes of variability, such as diurnal cycles, are lost or recovered, following anthropogenic stress. We conducted an aquatic mesocosm experiment to test whether prior application of environmental stress, in the form of moderate acidification, affected the diurnal cycle of dissolved oxygen when exposed to severe acidification. High-frequency data from sensor loggers deployed in 12 mesocosms showed that severe acidification caused a temporary loss of diurnal variation in dissolved oxygen concentration. However, pre-exposure to an acidic environment resulted in the persistence of the diurnal cycle. We hypothesize that pre-exposure shifted the community to acid tolerant genotypes and/or species of algae and other photosynthetic organisms. Our findings suggest that the stability of ecosystem cycles is intrinsically liked to the stress tolerance of the species assemblage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→