Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a new approach for the analysis of high‐resolution digital camera photographs taken by photographers who have fortuitous been able to capture rare events, such as the glowing sky phenomenon known as strong thermal emission velocity enhancement (STEVE). This method is especially effective with a time lapse series of images of the night sky taken under constant camera settings with a steady pointing. Stars, planets, and satellites seen in such images can be used to determine the precise and accurate registration of camera pixels to coordinates of angular altitude and azimuth. The location of satellites in the image enables precise and accurate synchronization of the images. We apply these techniques to the series of photographs of STEVE taken on July 25, 2016. We confirm the altitude structure previously found for STEVE. We find it most likely that the green picket fence features often seen during STEVE events are produced by auroral electron precipitation. With the precipitation assumption, we are able to extract novel information about the energy spectrum of the particles responsible for the production of STEVE luminosity in this particular event. Similarly, analyses of archived digital photographs may constitute a treasure trove of important data for improved understanding of rare and transient events, such as STEVE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".