Maximized Privacy-Preserving Outsourcing on Support Vector Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite its remarkable capability in handling arbitrary cluster shapes, support vector clustering (SVC) suffers from pricey storage of kernel matrix and costly computations. Outsourcing data or function on demand is intuitively expected, yet it raises a great violation of privacy. We propose maximized privacy-preserving outsourcing on SVC (MPPSVC), which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first all-phase outsourceable solution. For privacy-preserving, we exploit the properties of homomorphic encryption and secure two-party computation. To break through the operation limitation, we propose a reformative SVC with elementary operations (RSVC-EO, the core of MPPSVC), in which a series of designs make selective outsourcing phase possible. In the training phase, we develop a dual coordinate descent solver, which avoids interactions before getting the encrypted coefficient vector. In the labeling phase, we design a fresh convex decomposition cluster labeling, by which no iteration is required by convex decomposition and no sampling checks exist in connectivity analysis. Afterward, we customize secure protocols to match these operations for essential interactions in the encrypted domain. Considering the privacy-preserving property and efficiency in a semi-honest environment, we proved MPPSVC’s robustness against adversarial attacks. Our experimental results confirm that MPPSVC achieves comparable accuracies to RSVC-EO, which outperforms the state-of-the-art variants of SVC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.034 | 0.080 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".