MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001581719 · doi:10.25904/1912/925

Community Bioarchaeology in Cape York, QLD

2020· dissertation· en· W3001581719 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shaun Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundSimon Fraser UniversitySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGriffith University
KeywordsPrehistoryArchaeologyGeographyCapeCaveBioarchaeologyPeninsula

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cape York Peninsula in the far north east of Australia is the closest mainland point to Papua New Guinea and could well prove to be the site of initial colonisation of the continent >60,000 years ago. This tropical landscape of endemic flora and fauna has been isolated from Australia’s urban and industrial activity for the past 200 years, remaining remote and to a large degree unpopulated. The lack of recent development has resulted in very few archaeological investigations in the region, leaving gaps in our understanding of Cape York prehistory. This thesis provides new narratives on prehistory in the region through bioarchaeological and biogeochemical studies of Aboriginal human remains. These investigations have been framed and directed by Indigenous communities throughout Cape York and represent a form of community bioarchaeology. Biogeochemistry has been used globally in archaeology for over 40 years, however in Australia these techniques remain underutilised. Being a destructive, complicated and expensive set of analyses, with the added complexity of piecing together a meaningful narrative from small datasets, has resulted in few Australian archaeological isotope studies. The research presented here is one of the most extensive archaeological isotope projects conducted in the region to-date. In partnership with Aboriginal communities from Cape York we examined prehistoric/historic burials and mortuary cave internments from savannah and continental island settings. Landscape strontium isotope ratio (87Sr/86Sr) baseline data were also gathered for comparison with human results to investigate mobility and community structure. This thesis is presented as five scientific studies that have been prepared as chapters in a publication format for submission to international peer reviewed journals. I have conducted the fieldwork, historical research, scientific analyses and writing of all of these documents with editing, field/technical assistance and funding attributed to my supervisory team and co-authors. Preliminary chapters detail the excavation and analyses of human remains from the Flinders Islands and Gulf Plains of Cape York, discussing them within archaeological and historical contexts. The following study measures 87Sr/86Sr in surface soils, vegetation, waterways and mammalian fauna to test the reliability of predicting human provenance in Cape York, taking geological, seasonal and weathering processes into account. Regional portions of this baseline data are then analysed in detail in two case studies comparing human tooth enamel and dentine 87Sr/86Sr, carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope signatures to interpret prehistoric and colonial period mobility and provenance. This thesis forms part of an overarching ARC project: (ARC Linkage: LP140100387) to test scientific techniques for provenancing Aboriginal ancestral remains. The studies presented here demonstrates the research value of isotope geochemistry in Australian bioarchaeology and provides a foundation for future repatriation of unprovenanced Aboriginal remains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.279
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)Same topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207