MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3001608467 · doi:10.1101/2020.01.24.917203

A Fob1 independent role for the Smc5/6 complex in the rDNA that modulates lifespan

2020· preprint· en· W3001608467 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Moradi-Fard, Aditya Mojumdar, Megan Chan, Troy A. A. Harkness, Jennifer A. Cobb

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyGene silencingChromatinGeneticsHomologous recombinationTranscriptional regulationMutantCell biologyDNAGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The ribosomal DNA (rDNA) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is in one tandem repeat array on Chromosome XII. Two spacer regions within each repetitive element, called n on-transcribed s pacer 1 (NTS1) and NTS2, are important in nucleolar organization. Smc5/6 localizes to both NTS1 and NTS2 and is involved in the regulation of Sir2 and Cohibin binding at NTS1, whereas Fob1 and Sir2 are required for optimal binding of the complex to NTS1 and NTS2, respectively. We demonstrate that Smc5/6 functions in chromatin silencing at NTS1 independently of its role in homologous recombination (HR) when forks pause at the replication fork barrier (RFB). In contrast, when the complex does not localize to the rDNA in nse3 -1 mutants, the shortened lifespan correlates with NTS2 homeostasis independently of FOB1 status. Our data identify the importance of Smc5/6 integrity in NTS2 transcriptional silencing and repeat tethering, which in turn underscores rDNA stability and replicative lifespan. Highlights Smc5/6 is important for transcriptional silencing in the rDNA. Smc5/6 tethers the rDNA array to the periphery. Transcriptional silencing of ncRNA at NTS1 and NTS2 is differentially regulated. Smc5/6 has a role in rDNA maintenance independent of HR processing at the RFB. Fob1-independent disruption of Smc5/6 at NTS2 leads to lifespan reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→