MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CANADA IN THE GEOPOLITICAL REALITIES OF THE XXI CENTURY: SOME TURNING POINTS OF THE FOREIGN ECONOMIC COURSE

2019· article· en· W3001664702 on OpenAlex
Andrey N. Komarov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Political Sciences History International Relations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeopoliticsAlliancePoliticsForeign policyHistoriographyPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Political economyEconomic historyEconomySociologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article attempts to consider the influence of the geopolitical factor on the foreign economic relations of Canada in 2014-2018. The author concludes that the Canadian political elites associate their foreign economic activity primarily with those states, that are united with them in strategic military-political alliances. A typical example of this is the free trade agreement with the EU, concluded by the Conservative government of Harper, as well as the U. S. M. C. A. agreement, coordinated by Canada first and foremost with the United States, its main ally in the military-political alliance of NATO. This study is based on the historical sources, which are connected with the existing programmes of Canadian Liberals and Conservatives, Donald Trump’s speeches, as well as on the analysis of foreign and domestic historiography on this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it