MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001769279 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011015

Nonlinear Dynamics of Human Aortas for Material Characterization

2020· article· en· W3001769279 on OpenAlexafffund
Marco Amabili, Prabakaran Balasubramanian, Isabella Bozzo, Ivan D. Breslavsky, Giovanni Ferrari, Giulio Franchini, Francesco Giovanniello, Chloé Pogue

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPulsatile flowThoracic aortaViscoelasticityDescending aortaAortaBiomedical engineeringStiffnessMaterials scienceNonlinear systemMechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceMedicineCardiologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evaluating the nonlinear dynamics of human descending thoracic aortas is essential for building the next generation of vascular prostheses. This study characterizes the nonlinear dynamics, viscoelastic material properties, and fluid-structure interaction of 11 ex-vivo human descending thoracic aortas the full range of physiological heart rates. The aortic segments are harvested from heart-beating donors screened for transplants. A mock circulatory loop is developed to reproduce physiological pulsatile pressure and flow. The results show cyclic axisymmetric diameter changes, which are satisfactorily compared to in-vivo measurements at a resting pulse rate of 60 bpm, with an additional bending vibration. An increase of the dynamic stiffness (i.e., storage modulus) with age is also observed. This increase is accompanied by a strong reduction with age of the cyclic diameter change during the heart pulsation at 60 bpm and by a significant reduction of the loss factor (i.e., damping). Large dissipation is observed at higher pulse rates due to the combined effects of fluid-structure interaction and viscoelasticity of the aortic wall. This study presents data necessary for developing innovative grafts that better mimic the dynamics of the aorta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review XSame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207