MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002030180 · doi:10.1115/1.4046091

A Real-Time C3 Continuous Tool Path Smoothing and Interpolation Algorithm for Five-Axis Machine Tools

2020· article· en· W3002030180 on OpenAlexaff
Qin Hu, Youping Chen, Xiaoliang Jin, Jixiang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJerkSmoothingInterpolation (computer graphics)AlgorithmMachine toolOrientation (vector space)Position (finance)AccelerationComputer scienceMathematicsComputer visionMotion (physics)GeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Local corner smoothing method is commonly adopted to smooth linear (G01) tool path segments in computer numerical control (CNC) machining to realize continuous motion at transition corners. However, because of the highly non-linear relation between the arc-length and the spline parameter, and the challenge to synchronize the tool tip position and tool orientation, real-time and high-order continuous five-axis tool path smoothing and interpolation algorithms have not been well studied. This paper proposes a real-time C3 continuous corner smoothing and interpolation algorithm for five-axis machine tools. The transition corners of the tool tip position and tool orientation are analytically smoothed in the workpiece coordinate system (WCS) and the machine coordinate system (MCS) by C3 continuous PH splines, respectively. The maximum deviation errors of the smoothed tool tip position and the tool orientation are both constrained in the WCS. An analytical synchronization algorithm is developed to guarantee the motion variance of the smoothed tool orientation related to the tool tip displacement is also C3 continuous. The corresponding real-time interpolation method is developed with a continuous and peak-constrained jerk. Simulation results verify that the maximum deviation errors caused by the tool path smoothing algorithm are constrained, and continuous acceleration and jerk of each axis are achieved along the entire tool path. Comparisons demonstrate that the proposed algorithms achieve lower amplitude and variance of acceleration and jerk when compared with existing methods. Experiments show that the proposed five-axis corner smoothing and interpolation algorithms are serially executed in real-time with 0.5-ms cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207