MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002106431 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202022601009

Computing Four-Center Two-Electron Coulomb Integrals Using Exponential Transformations and Trapezoidal Rule

2020· article· en· W3002106431 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Lovrod, Hassan Safouhi

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoulombCenter (category theory)ComputationConvergence (economics)ElectronExponential functionOrder of integration (calculus)PhysicsMathematicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The numerical evaluations of the four-center two-electron Coulomb integrals are among the most time-consuming computations involved in molecular electronic structure calculations. In the present paper we extend the double exponential (DE) transform method, previously developed for the numerical evaluation of threecenter one-electron molecular integrals [J. Lovrod, H. Safouhi, Molecular Physics (2019) DOI: 10.1030/0026867.2019.1619854 ], to four-center two-electron integrals. The fast convergence properties analyzed in the numerical section illustrate the advantages of the new approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207