MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002171489 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.052011

Search for proton decay into three charged leptons in 0.37 megaton-years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande

2020· article· en· W3002171489 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Tanaka, K. Abe, C. Bronner, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, S. Imaizumi, Hiroshi Itô, J. Kameda, Y. Kataoka, Y. Kato, Y. Kishimoto, Ll. Marti, M. Miura, S. Moriyama, T. Mochizuki, M. Nakahata, Y. Nakajima, S. Nakayama, T. Okada, Ken‐ichi Okamoto, A. Orii, G. Pronost, H. Sekiya, M. Shiozawa, Y. Sonoda, A. Takeda, A. Takenaka, Hiroyuki Tanaka, T. Yano, R. Akutsu, T. Kajita, K. Okumura, R. Wang, J. Xia, D. Bravo, L. Labarga, P. Fernández, F. d. M. Blaszczyk, E. Kearns, J. L. Raaf, J. L. Stone, L. Wan, T. Wester, J. Bian, N. J. Griskevich, W. R. Kropp, S. Locke, S. Mine, M. Smy, H. W. Sobel, Volodymyr Takhistov, P. Weatherly, J. Hill, J. Y. Kim, I. T. Lim, R. G. Park, B. Bodur, K. Scholberg, C. W. Walter, A. Coffani, O. Drapier, S. El Hedri, M. Gonin, Th. A. Mueller, P. Paganini, T. Ishizuka, T. Nakamura, J. S. Jang, J. G. Learned, S. Matsuno, R. P. Litchfield, A. A. Sztuc, Y. Uchida, V. Berardi, M G Catanesi, E. Radicioni, N. F. Calabria, G. De Rosa, G. Collazuol, F. Iacob, L. Ludovici, Y. Nishimura, S. Cao, M. Friend, T. Hasegawa, Toru Ishida, T. Kobayashi, T. Nakadaira, K. Nakamura, Y. Oyama, K. Sakashita, T. Sekiguchi, T. Tsukamoto, M. Hasegawa, Yuki Isobe, H. Miyabe, Y. Nakano, T. Shiozawa, T. Sugimoto, A. T. Suzuki, Y. Takeuchi, A. Ali, Yosuke Ashida, S. Hirota, M. Jiang, M. Mori, KE. Nakamura, T. Nakaya, R. A. Wendell, L. H. V. Anthony, N. McCauley, P. Mehta, A. Pritchard, K. M. Tsui, Y. Fukuda, Y. Itow, T. Niwa, M. Taani, M Tsukada, P. Mijakowski, K. Frankiewicz, C. K. Jung, C. Vilela, M. J. Wilking, C. Yanagisawa, D. Fukuda, M. Harada, K. Hagiwara, T. Horai, H. Ishino, S. Ito, Y. Koshio, M. Sakuda, Y. Takahira, C. F. Xu, Y. Kuno, D. Barrow, L. Cook, Charles Simpson, D. Wark, F. Nova, T. Boschi, F. Di Lodovico, S. Molina Sedgwick, Hirotaka Ito, S. B. Kim, J. Y. Yang, M. D. Thiesse, L.F. Thompson, H. Okazawa, Y. Choi, K. Nishijima, M. Koshiba, M. Yokoyama, A. Goldsack, K. Martens, B. Quilain, Y. Suzuki, M. R. Vagins, M. Kuze, T. Yoshida, M. Ishitsuka, R. Matsumoto, Kouji Ohta, J. F. Martin, C. Nantais, H. A. Tanaka, T. Towstego, M. Hartz, A. Konaka, P. de Perio, N. W. Prouse, S. Chen, B. D. Xu, B. Richards, B. Jamieson, J. Walker, A. Minamino, G. Pintaudi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegTRIUMFUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyKerman Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationNarodowym Centrum NaukiNarodowe Centrum NaukiU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionWestern Canada Research GridNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsSuper-KamiokandePhysicsMuonLeptonProton decayProtonNuclear physicsBranching fractionElectronParticle physicsRange (aeronautics)NeutrinoSolar neutrinoNeutrino oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for proton decay into three charged leptons has been performed by using $0.37\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{Mton}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathrm{years}$ of data collected in Super-Kamiokande. All possible combinations of electrons, muons, and their antiparticles consistent with charge conservation were considered as decay modes. No significant excess of events has been found over the background, and lower limits on the proton lifetime divided by the branching ratio have been obtained. The limits range between $9.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{33}$ and $3.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{34}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$ at 90% confidence level, improving by more than an order of magnitude upon limits from previous experiments. A first limit has been set for the $p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{e}^{+}{e}^{+}$ mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207