Les cultes des protestants. Méthodes originales pour approcher les rites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enfin un livre qui expose ce que les cultes sont avant de prescrire ce qu'ils devraient être. Dans cet ouvrage, Olivier Bauer parcourt l'ensemble du culte avec neuf articles consacrés aux cultes, neuf articles nourris par trente ans d'expérience comme théologien et comme pasteur en Suisse, en France, en Polynésie française, aux Etats-Unis et au Canada, neuf articles publiés entre 2001 et 2014 en Europe et en Amérique du Nord. Qui célèbre des cultes y trouvera des propositions pratiques. Qui s'intéresse aux coulisses y trouvera des informations inédites. Qui se pose des questions de fond - à quoi sert le culte ? La foi vient-elle seulement de ce que l'on entend ? Quel est le statut des médiations théologiques ? - y trouvera des réponses. Qui étudie le rite y trouvera des outils méthodologiques et des concepts. Qui aime les débats y trouvera la lettre qu'Olivier Bauer a envoyée à Joseph Ratzinger (Benoît XVI) pour critiquer sa conception de la messe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".