MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002179409

Les cultes des protestants. Méthodes originales pour approcher les rites

2017· article· fr· W3002179409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Bauer

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enfin un livre qui expose ce que les cultes sont avant de prescrire ce qu'ils devraient être. Dans cet ouvrage, Olivier Bauer parcourt l'ensemble du culte avec neuf articles consacrés aux cultes, neuf articles nourris par trente ans d'expérience comme théologien et comme pasteur en Suisse, en France, en Polynésie française, aux Etats-Unis et au Canada, neuf articles publiés entre 2001 et 2014 en Europe et en Amérique du Nord. Qui célèbre des cultes y trouvera des propositions pratiques. Qui s'intéresse aux coulisses y trouvera des informations inédites. Qui se pose des questions de fond - à quoi sert le culte ? La foi vient-elle seulement de ce que l'on entend ? Quel est le statut des médiations théologiques ? - y trouvera des réponses. Qui étudie le rite y trouvera des outils méthodologiques et des concepts. Qui aime les débats y trouvera la lettre qu'Olivier Bauer a envoyée à Joseph Ratzinger (Benoît XVI) pour critiquer sa conception de la messe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRISSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207