MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002180218 · doi:10.221751/rmc2016.089

Real Time Prediction of Backfat Composition and Iodine Value by Portable Near Infrared Spectroscopy in a Diverse Population of Pigs

2017· article· en· W3002180218 on OpenAlex
N. Prieto, M. E. R. Dugan, M. Juárez, Ó. López-Campos, R. T. Zijlstra, J.L. Aalhus

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMeat and Muscle Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIodine valueAnimal sciencePopulationPolyunsaturated fatty acidPartial least squares regressionChemistryNear infrared reflectance spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MathematicsFatty acidNear-infrared spectroscopyFood scienceBiologyChromatographyStatisticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to test the potential of portable near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict the fatty acid (FA) composition and iodine value (IV) of backfat in real time at the abattoir using a large and variable population of pigs.Materials and MethodsIn total, 357 pigs from various genetic backgrounds (Duroc, Lacombe, Iberian crossbreds), genders, diets (commercial, high oleic acid, high ɑ-linolenic acid), and slaughter weights (either 120 or 140 kg) were raised at the Lacombe Research and Development Centre (LaRDC-Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canada). At slaughter, pigs were stunned, exsanguinated, dressed, pasteurized and eviscerated at the LaRDC federally-inspected abattoir. Following carcass splitting, at 45 min post mortem a clean cut surface of the inner layer of backfat from the left side was transversely scanned (350 to 2,500 nm) at the shoulder, using a hand-held ASD fiber-optics pro-reflectance probe attached to a portable LabSpec 4 Standard-Res spectrometer (Analytical Spectral Device-ASD Inc.). Following collection of NIR spectra, a representative 5-g sample of the inner backfat layer was collected from each pig and stored at -80°C until FA profiles were analyzed by gas chromatography (Turner et al., 2014). Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was used to estimate FA proportions, ratios and IV, using spectra as independent variables.ResultsNIRS successfully predicted the total polyunsaturated and n-3 FA proportions, polyunsaturated/saturated ratio and IV (R2 > 0.90; ratio performance deviation, RPD > 3.0). This portable technology also met the requirements for a quick screening of the proportions of total saturated, monounsaturated and n-6 FA, n-6/n-3 ratio, and some individual FA such as C18:2n-6 and C18:3n-3 (0.80 < R2 < 0.89; 2.10 < RPD < 2.63). Conversely, unreliable estimations were observed for other individual FA such as C16:0, C18:0 and C18:1 (R2 = 0.60 to 0.77; RPD < 1.80), probably due to their low variability (coefficient of variation = 4 to 8%).ConclusionPortable NIR spectroscopy can be used as a fast, online tool to successfully predict fatty acid composition and iodine value of backfat from pig carcasses. The abattoir implementation of this technology, to collect spectra directly on the carcass, opens new possibilities for early sorting of carcasses based on fat composition or hardness for marketing purposes. Application of this technology may provide benefits including development of quality standards and payment grids for different fat qualities, use by specialty pork producers for product development and quality control, and use by pig breeding companies to assist in selection for desirable fat quality. Further testing of this technology on fast-moving abattoir processing lines is still required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it