MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002283892 · doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1694535

Neurocranial anatomy of<i>Seymouria</i>from Richards Spur, Oklahoma

2019· article· en· W3002283892 on OpenAlexaff
Kayla D. Bazzana, Bryan M. Gee, Joseph J. Bevitt, Robert R. Reisz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmnioteAnatomyEndocastBiologyPectoral girdleNeurocraniumPaleontologyAutapomorphySkullPhylogenetic treeVertebrate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seymouriamorphs are a group of Permo-Carboniferous tetrapods with both terrestrial and aquatic members. Since their initial discovery, they have been proposed as phylogenetic intermediates on the amniote stem between temnospondyl amphibians and crown amniotes and are thus frequently used in phylogenetic analyses of both early amniotes and, more broadly, Paleozoic tetrapods. We utilized neutron computed tomography (nCT) to study the morphology of the first cranial material of Seymouria from the early Permian karst deposits found at the Dolese Brothers Limestone Quarry near Richards Spur, Oklahoma. The presence of a mixture of purported autapomorphies of both of the better-known species of Seymouria, S. baylorensis and S. sanjuanensis, prevents referral to either species; the potential for ontogenetic variation in many of these characters highlights the need to reevaluate the taxonomy of these species. Our description of the tomographic data focuses on the braincase and otic capsule and helps to clarify details of previously poorly known neurocranial anatomy, such as an orbitosphenoid that expands dorsally to abut the overlying frontals. The prootic and the opisthotic are complex structures that preserve clear impressions of all three semicircular canals and that frame the laterally extensive otic tube and possibly the perilymphatic duct. Our analysis provides additional details regarding a previously described but poorly known ossification of the synotic tectum and highlights the ongoing uncertainty regarding the homology of such ossifications across Paleozoic tetrapods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vertebrate PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207