MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002291166 · doi:10.1145/3369114.3369140

Any Angle Path Finding in Stochastic Obstacle Scenes

2019· article· en· W3002291166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ufuk Aslan, Ali Fuat Alkaya, Serkan Yıldırım, Vural Aksakallı

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacleShortest path problemDijkstra's algorithmDiscretizationComputer scienceTraverseEuclidean shortest pathPath (computing)Motion planningPathfindingAlgorithmMathematical optimizationGraphK shortest path routingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceRobotGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Path planning with stochastic obstacles is well known researching area. The Canadian traveler problem (CTP) is a challenging stochastic optimization problem of traversing in a given graph having blocked edges and the disambiguation status of these edges can be settled with predefined probabilities. Discretized version of stochastic obstacle scene problem (D-SOSP) is most commonly used variant of CTP. The objective is to design a travel plan that would guarantee the shortest path including the obstacle disambiguation cost. In this work, we present Any-Angle (ANYA) path finding in discretized stochastic obstacle scenes using the exact algorithm AO* with caching (CAO*). The admissible upper bounds in the CAO* are found by making use of Dijkstra's shortest path. However, ANYA algorithm, being recently proposed, is already shown to outperform shortest path algorithms by investigating the interval sets. Our methodology is exhibited distinctly via computational examples involving a data map of navy forces minefield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207