MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002375826 · doi:10.1113/jp278731

Evidence for a physiological role of pulmonary arterial baroreceptors in sympathetic neural activation in healthy humans

2020· article· en· W3002375826 on OpenAlexafffund
Lydia L. Simpson, Victoria L. Meah, Andrew R. Steele, Suman Thapamagar, Christopher Gasho, James D. Anholm, Aimee L. Drane, Tony G. Dawkins, Stephen A. Busch, Samuel J. Oliver, Justin S. Lawley, Michael M. Tymko, Phillip N. Ainslie, Craig D. Steinback, Mike Stembridge, Jonathan P. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Heart FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsBaroreceptorMedicineNeural activityCardiologySympathetic nervous systemNeuroscienceInternal medicineAnesthesiaBlood pressureHeart ratePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points In an anaesthetised animal model, independent stimulation of baroreceptors in the pulmonary artery elicits reflex sympathoexcitation. In humans, pulmonary arterial pressure is positively related to basal muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) under conditions where elevated pulmonary pressure is evident (e.g. high altitude); however, a causal link is not established. Using a novel experimental approach, we demonstrate that reducing pulmonary arterial pressure lowers basal MSNA in healthy humans. This response is distinct from the negative feedback reflex mediated by aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptors when systemic arterial pressure is lowered. Afferent input from pulmonary arterial baroreceptors may contribute to sympathetic neural activation in healthy lowland natives exposed to high altitude. Abstract In animal models, distension of baroreceptors located in the pulmonary artery induces a reflex increase in sympathetic outflow; however, this has not been examined in humans. Therefore, we investigated whether reductions in pulmonary arterial pressure influenced sympathetic outflow and baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Healthy lowlanders ( n = 13; 5 females) were studied 4–8 days following arrival at high altitude (4383 m; Cerro de Pasco, Peru), a setting that increases both pulmonary arterial pressure and sympathetic outflow. MSNA (microneurography) and blood pressure (BP; photoplethysmography) were measured continuously during ambient air breathing (Amb) and a 6 min inhalation of the vasodilator nitric oxide (iNO; 40 ppm in 21% O 2 ), to selectively lower pulmonary arterial pressure. A modified Oxford test was performed under both conditions. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was determined using Doppler echocardiography. iNO reduced PASP (24 ± 3 vs . 32 ± 5 mmHg; P < 0.001) compared to Amb, with a similar reduction in MSNA total activity (1369 ± 576 to 994 ± 474 a.u min −1 ; P = 0.01). iNO also reduced the MSNA operating point (burst incidence; 39 ± 16 to 33 ± 17 bursts·100 Hb −1 ; P = 0.01) and diastolic operating pressure (82 ± 8 to 80 ± 8 mmHg; P < 0.001) compared to Amb, without changing heart rate ( P = 0.6) or vascular–sympathetic baroreflex gain ( P = 0.85). In conclusion, unloading of pulmonary arterial baroreceptors reduced basal sympathetic outflow to the skeletal muscle vasculature and reset vascular–sympathetic baroreflex control of MSNA downward and leftward in healthy humans at high altitude. These data suggest the existence of a lesser‐known reflex input involved in sympathetic activation in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207