Північне Причорномор’я у тиражній графіці останньої чверті XVIIІ ст. – початку ХІХ ст.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the age of Enlightenment, the need for reflection of external phenomena of life and modern events was growing. In this connection, the art of printing graphic became more popular, which in the cultural life of Europe was associated with the needs of society in enlightening and exchanging contemporary and historical facts. Unlike paintings and unique graphics, the printing graphic didn’t have such an elitist character and a limited range of viewers. Objects of consumption of printing graphic were wider social strata, which is why it was an important way to retranslate reality, designed for mass spectators. There were two stages in the development of the printing graphic of the last quarter of the 18th century – early 19th century, during which a complex of unique visual sources was formed. Xylography and engraving on metal were the main way of informative reproduction of the Northern Black Sea realities of the last quarter of the 18th – beginning of the 19th century. Xylography was used mainly in book graphics. In the 19th century xylography played a secondary role in the recording of information, namely performing the functions of registration. The engraving on steel was the main way in the first decades of the 19th century. The engraver was mainly of foreign origin, it appeared mainly abroad in large circulations of the image, including those with the Northern Black Sea subjects. A significant part of the works of painting and graphics of the last quarter of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries have been preserved and updated in the print graphic on the history of the Northern Black Sea region. This significant complex of visual sources focuses on covering ethnic diversity as a fashion for Orientalism and learning the world as part of educational practices and military history, as the formation of new imperial myths for the attachment of the annexed lands of the Northern Black Sea region to the Russian Empire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.159 | 0.190 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it