MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002423420 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab68c8

Transient Gas Distribution in Porous Transport Layers of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolyzers

2020· article· en· W3002423420 on OpenAlexaff
ChungHyuk Lee, Jason Keonhag Lee, Benzhong Zhao, Kieran F. Fahy, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteAnodeElectrolysisSaturation (graph theory)Materials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, we elucidated the dynamic gas transport behavior in the anode porous transport layer (PTL) of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzers via in operando synchrotron X-ray imaging. The imaging results showed that the gas saturation in the PTL reached steady state more rapidly with a steep current density ramp-up and a shallow ramp-down (compared to a shallow ramp-up and a steep ramp-down, respectively). Additionally, the gas accumulation was characterized by a faster response time compared to that of the gas removal due to the relatively slow migration of residual gas from the catalyst layer-PTL interface to the flow channels. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of gas response behavior on gas saturation during intermittent electrolyzer operation. Intermittent operation led to an increase in residual gas accumulation, which negatively impacted the electrolyzer performance. Our results are key for informing design and operating strategies for mitigating such hysteresis effects and improving the performance of PEM electrolyzers when coupled with intermittent renewable energy sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207