Estimated susceptibility of Canadian meningococcal B isolates to a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (MenB-FHbp)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) remains a health risk in Canada and globally. Two MenB vaccines are now approved for use. An understanding of the genotype of Canadian strains and the potential strain coverage conferred by the MenB-FHbp vaccine is needed to inform immunization policies. METHODS: Serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis strains responsible for meningococcal disease in Canada from 2006 to 2012 were collected as part of the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active surveillance network. Genotypic analysis was done on MenB isolates from 2006 to 2012 with determination of fHbp surface expression for a subset of isolates: those occurring from 2010 to 2012. RESULTS: Two clonal complexes (cc269 and cc41/44) were observed in 68.8% of the 276 isolates. A total of 50 different fHbp peptides were identified among isolates from 2006 to 2012. Surface expression of fHbp was detected on 95% of MenB isolates from 2010 to 2012 and 91% of isolates expressed fHbp at levels that are predicted to be susceptible to the bactericidal immune response elicited by the MenB-FHbp vaccine. Some regional differences were observed, particularly in isolates from British Columbia and Quebec. CONCLUSION: The majority of MenB isolates responsible for meningococcal disease in Canada expressed fHbp at levels predicted to be sufficient for complement mediated bactericidal activity in the presence of MenB-FHbp induced serum antibodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".