Microsimulating Cross-Border Truck Movements between Ontario and the United States: An Application using Connected Vehicle Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The land-border crossings between Canada and the United States facilitate over half of the goods transported between the two countries. Since trucks are the primary mode of transportation for the movement of these goods, studying the traffic flows and the characteristics of border crossings is of paramount importance for decision makers, planners and researchers. The province of Ontario is home to the busiest border crossings in Canada including the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor, Ontario and the Blue Water Bridge in Sarnia, Ontario. GPS data collected from a large sample of trucks shows the route choice characteristics for these border crossings. The same dataset also shows the destination locations for these trucks. This thesis utilizes VISSIM, a microscopic traffic simulator, and its dynamic traffic assignment, an imbedded route choice model, to replicate these route choice conditions. Once the model is validated with the shares of flows from the observed (i.e., reference) datasets, the route choice behavior is analyzed under different delay conditions. The research also analyzed the effects of connected vehicle technology, at different penetration rates, on the efficiency of border crossing operations. As the connected vehicles increased in the traffic stream, it was observed that traffic was more streamlined and would switch to use the Blue Water Bridge during the simulation of an incident on Highway 401. The penetration rate was increased in 20% increments and with 100% penetration, 7% of total truck traffic had switched to Blue Water Bridge to travel to their U.S. destination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".