Signet Ring Early Gastric Cancer: Seize the Opportunity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 66-year-old Caucasian female presented for endoscopy due to nonspecific symptoms of abdominal pain and bloating. During endoscopy, random gastric and duodenal biopsies were taken due to reported ‘patchy erythema’ in the stomach and to rule out celiac, respectively. Surprisingly, a single gastric biopsy specimen demonstrated poorly differentiated signet ring gastric cancer. The procedure was repeated by an endoscopist trained in magnifying endoscopy. Upon entry into the stomach, there was copious bilious material and mucus (Figure 1a). After approximately 10 minutes of vigorous washing with simethicone and N-acetylcysteine, a thorough examination could be achieved (Figure 1b–d). The lesion was detected with white light endoscopy and demonstrated a Paris IIb+IIc morphology. The lesion was characterized with image-enhanced endoscopy and magnification (Figure 1b–f). It demonstrated findings suggestive of undifferentiated early gastric cancer (EGC), namely the stretch sign, corkscrew pattern vessels and intralobular loop pattern 2 (ILL-2) (Figure 1d–f) (1,2). A curative resection was achieved with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) (Figure 2) (3). Early gastric cancer diagnosis. (a) bilious staining upon entry, washing with simethicone and mucolytic (b) lesion with white light (c) optical enhancement (d) magnification, blue arrows indicating demarcation between cancer (left) and normal mucosa (right) (e) stretch sign (red circle) due to infiltration by signet cells f) corkscrew pattern vessels (green arrows). Early gastric cancer resection and pathology. (a–c) Marking and ESD of the lesion; (d) signet cell carcinoma; tumour cells infiltrate superficial lamina propria expanding inter-pit distance (black arrows), correlates with stretch sign (100× magnification) (e) normal inter-pit spacing of adjacent normal gastric mucosa (100× magnification) (f) signet ring carcinoma; tumour cells have cytoplasmic mucin vacuole and eccentrically displaced nucleus (200× magnification) (g) cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (400× magnification). A misconception by Western endoscopists is that flat EGC do not occur in the western population. Although the incidence of gastric cancer in the west is relatively low, EGC do occur and can be missed (4). With every endoscopic exam, the opportunity to detect and potentially cure EGCs should be seized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".