MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002575835

Japan's Prefectural-Level KLEMS: Productivity Comparisons and Service Price Differences

2019· article· en· W3002575835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joji Tokui, Takeshi Mizuta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational productivity monitor · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsProductivityService (business)EstimationEconometricsPurchasing powerPurchasing power parityTertiary sector of the economyTotal factor productivityStandard deviationMacroeconomicsEconomyStatisticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compile a prefectural-level KLEMS database for Japan and conduct productivity comparisons for Japanese 47 prefectures. One of the difficulties in compiling regional KLEMS database is how to handle variation in service prices across regions. To cope with this problem, we estimated cross-regional pricelevel differences in each industry in the service sector based on prefectural-level item-wise data of service prices. For estimation, we applied the Country-ProductDummy (CPD) method, a method used to estimate absolute purchasing power parities among countries. As a result of re-calculation, the standard deviation of cross-regional TFP difference indices in 2009 decreased by around 13 per cent. In addition, by using the derived cross-regional price difference indices, we confirmed that the Balassa-Samuelson effect, which holds among international economies, also holds among regional economies in Japan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational productivity monitorSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207