L’influence du soutien scolaire sur l’engagement d’adolescents à risque de décrochage scolaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une étude portant sur le soutien scolaire offert par des parents québécois pour favoriser l’engagement de leur adolescent à risque de décrochage scolaire (DS) lors de la transition primaire-secondaire (TPS). Comme l’objectif général de recherche était de décrire le soutien scolaire au regard des perceptions de 11 parents et de leur adolescent, des entrevues individuelles semi-dirigées ont été menées. L’analyse inductive générale des données qualitatives a mis en évidence l’importance que les parents adaptent, aussi souvent que nécessaire, leur soutien scolaire en fonction de leurs propres caractéristiques parentales, mais également en fonction des caractéristiques et des besoins de leur adolescent. Ces résultats mènent à penser que la connaissance de l’adolescent constitue la clé d’entrée d’une implication parentale adaptée, notamment le soutien scolaire, permettant de favoriser l’engagement et la réussite des adolescents à risque de DS lors de la TPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".