MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Field-driven gapless spin liquid in the spin-1 Kitaev honeycomb model

2020· article· en· W3002610794 on OpenAlexafffund
Ciarán Hickey, Christoph Berke, P. Peter Stavropoulos, Hae‐Young Kee, Simon Trebst

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaForschungszentrum JülichDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGapless playbackQuantum spin liquidAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsHoneycombSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsField (mathematics)Spin modelMagnetic fieldQuantumSpin polarizationMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors study the spin-1 generalization of the Kitaev honeycomb model in the presence of an external magnetic field. In the case of antiferromagnetic interactions, they find numerical evidence for the appearance of a gapless U(1) quantum spin liquid at intermediate field strengths

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207