MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002651514

In altum mittis radices humilitatis. Un estudio de las imágenes de María en contacto con la naturaleza. In altum mittis radices humilitatis. A Study of Marian Images in touch with Nature

2019· article· es· W3002651514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Elvira Mocholí Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenueDe Medio Aevo · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ciertos tipos iconograficos marianos se han mostrado especialmente propicios a las representaciones de la Virgen en relacion con algunos elementos naturales. La Madre de Dios se encuentra, a menudo, en contacto directo con la tierra en numerosas imagenes de la Virgen de la Humildad y en un jardin, rodeada de flores, en la Virgen de la Rosaleda; mientras que, tras su Asuncion, lirios y rosas asoman del sepulcro vacio. En todos estos casos, segun podemos inferir de su estudio iconografico, a partir de las fuentes patristicas y teologicas, la naturaleza es un simil de las virtudes de la Virgen, aunque no siempre. En algunas imagenes de la Scala Salutis , el suelo permite fijar a Maria en su condicion humana, a diferencia de Cristo, con quien comparte espacio. En conclusion, el elevado numero de imagenes donde la naturaleza, por una u otra razon, se encuentra asociada a la Madre de Dios, no son producto de la casualidad, ni anecdoticos, sino fruto de una compleja retorica visual. Abstract :  Certain Marian iconographic subjects have proved to be especially propitious to the representations of the Virgin in relation with some natural elements. The Mother of God is, often, in direct contact with the land in numerous images of the Virgin of Humility and in a garden, surrounded with flowers, in the Virgin of the Rose Garden; whereas, after her Assumption, lilies and roses bloom in the empty sepulcher. In all these cases, as we can figure out from their iconographic study, based on the Patristic and theological sources, the nature is an analogy of the virtues of the Virgin, but not always. In some images of the Scala Salutis , the ground allows to fix Mary in her human condition, unlike Christ, with whom she shares space. In conclusion, the high number of images where the nature, for any reason, is associated with the Mother of God, are not even neither casual or anecdotal, but a product of a complex visual rhetoric. References : Blaya Estrada, Nuria (1995), “La Virgen de la Humildad. Origen y significado”, Ars Longa 6, 163-171. Heisterbach, Cesareo de (1998), Dialogo de milagros (trad. esp. de Zacarias Prieto Hernandez, Dialogo de milagros de Cesareo de Heisterbach , Zamora, Monte Casino). King, Georgiana Goddard (1935), “The Virgin of Humility”, The Art Bulletin 17, 4, 474-491. Kirschbaum, Engelbert (1971), Lexikon der christlichen Ikonographie , Roma, Friburgo, Basilea, Viena, Herder. Koudounaris, Paul (2013), Heavenly bodies: cult treasures & spectacular saints from the catacombs , Londres, Thames & Hudson. Meiss, Millard (1936) “The Madonna of Humility”, Art Bulletin 18, 4, 435-465. Mocholi Martinez, Maria Elvira (2012), “El Juicio del alma de san Juan de Ribera en el contexto de la Escala de Salvacion”, El Patriarca Ribera y su tiempo. Religion, cultura y politica en la Edad Moderna , 639-655. Mocholi Martinez, Maria Elvira (2012), “El lugar de Maria intercesora en las imagenes de la Escala de Salvacion. Interpretacion iconografica de sus aspectos formales”, Imago. Revista de Emblematica y Cultura Visual 4, 7-22. Mocholi Martinez, Maria Elvira (2015), “La sombra de Cristo. Corporalidad y sentidos en el ambito celestial”, en Morales Folguera, Jose Miguel; Talavera Esteso, Francisco Jose; Escalera Perez, Reyes (eds.) (2015), Confluencia de la imagen y la palabra. Emblematica y artificio retorico , Anejos de Imago III, 363-374. Polzer, Joseph (2000), “Concerning the origin of the Madonna of Humility”, RACAR. Revue d’art Canadienne / Canadian Art Review 27, 1-2, 1-31. Reau, Louis (1996), Iconografia del Arte Cristiano. Nuevo Testamento , t. 1, vol. 2, Barcelona, Serbal. Sallay, Dora (2012), “The Avignon type of the Virgin of Humility. Examples in Siena”, en Radvanyi, Orsolya (ed.) (2012), Geest en gratie. Essays Presented to Ildiko Ember on Her Seventieth Birthday , Budapest, Szepműveszeti Muzeum, 104-111. Salvador Gonzalez, Jose Maria (2013), “ Nardus mea dedit odorem suum . Interpretacion iconografica de La Asuncion de Maria con sepulcro florido en el arte italiano bajomedieval a la luz de fuentes patristica y teologicas”, De Medio Aevo 1, 67-116. Salvador Gonzalez, Jose Maria (2017), “La doctrina de San Juan Damasceno sobre la muerte y la asuncion de Maria al cielo, y su posible influencia en las correspondientes iconografias medievales”, Eikon Imago 12, 2, 139-168. San Bernardo (1985), Obras completas. Edicion bilingue , t. III, Madrid, La Editorial Catolica. San Buenaventura (1963), Obras de San Buenaventura. Edicion bilingue , t. IV, Madrid, La Editorial Catolica. Saralegui, Leandro de (1928), “La Virgen de la Leche. Subsidia iconografica”, Archivo de Arte Valenciano 14, 85-98 Saralegui, Leandro de (1935), “Fuentes del influjo catalan en tierras de Valencia”, Archivo de Arte Valenciano 21, 19-56. Stratton, Susan (1994), The Immaculate Conception in Spanish art , Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, (trad. esp. de Checa Cremades, Jose Luis [1998], La Inmaculada Concepcion en el arte espanol , tirada aparte de Cuadernos de Arte e Iconografia, Madrid, Fundacion Universitaria Espanola, http://www.fuesp.com [12-10-2013]). Trens, Manuel (1946), Maria. Iconografia de la Virgen en el arte espanol , Madrid, Plus Ultra. Williamson, Beth (1996), The Virgin Lactans and the Madonna of Humility in Italy, Metz and Avignon in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries , tesis, University of London, Courtauld Institute, 295-313. Williamson, Beth (2007), “Site, Seeing and Salvation in Fourteenth-Century Avignon”, Art History 30, 1, 1-25. Williamson, Beth (2009), The Madonna of Humility. Development, Dissemination and Reception, c. 1340-1400 , Woodbridge, The Boydel Press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDe Medio AevoSame topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207