MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002705201 · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30382-6

Addressing the global cirrhosis epidemic: one size will not fit all

2020· article· en· W3002705201 on OpenAlexaff
Peter L. Wang, Jennifer A. Flemming

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental healthCirrhosisDisease burdenEpidemiologyPublic healthAlcoholic liver diseaseGlobal healthDiseasePopulationPsychological interventionPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cirrhosis is a global health concern, as the 11th most common cause of mortality worldwide that accounts for 2% of deaths annually. 1 WHOGlobal Health estimates 2016: disease burden by cause, age, sex, by country and by region. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.htmlDate: 2000–2016 Date accessed: October 21, 2019 Google Scholar The causes of cirrhosis are largely secondary to public health and lifestyle-related exposures, including hepatitis B and C, alcohol-related liver disease, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Therefore, cirrhosis epidemiology could be influenced by interventions targeted at reducing these conditions. Over the past several decades, regional and international efforts to mitigate cirrhosis risk factors have been developed, including WHO resolutions to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030, reduce harmful alcohol consumption, and tackle the obesity epidemic by promoting physical activity and a healthy diet. To assess the efficacy of these efforts on cirrhosis disease burden and to inform future health policy initiatives, the availability of contemporary epidemiological data is paramount, especially data that are stratified by cirrhosis cause and region. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017Cirrhosis imposes a substantial health burden on many countries and this burden has increased at the global level since 1990, partly due to population growth and ageing. Although the age-standardised death and DALY rates of cirrhosis decreased from 1990 to 2017, numbers of deaths and DALYs and the proportion of all global deaths due to cirrhosis increased. Despite the availability of effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis B and C, they were still the main causes of cirrhosis burden worldwide, particularly in low-income countries. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.014
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207