MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002728777 · doi:10.1115/imece2019-10773

Aero-Engine Vibration Propagation Analysis Using Bond Graph Transfer Path Analysis and Transmissibility Theory

2019· article· en· W3002728777 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed-Ehsan Mir-Haidari, Kamran Behdinan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBond graphFuselageVibrationComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringPath (computing)Transmissibility (structural dynamics)Aero engineEngineeringMechanical engineeringVibration isolationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In recent times, due to the increase in global energy commodities prices, aero-engine manufacturers are investing in advanced aero-engine technologies to reduce the operating costs. These innovative technologies include overall weight reductions to develop efficient aero-engines. Due to these circumstances, the overall exposure of the aero-engine to vibration transfer due to various loading conditions such as the rotor loading forces has significantly increased. Due to advancement in technologies and demand for greater passenger comfort, vibration transfer reduction to the aircraft fuselage has received prominent attention. In this paper, an analytical transmissibility study called the bond graph Transfer Path Analysis (TPA) has been extensively studied and its applications are explored. Bond Graph TPA is a reliable and feasible theoretical methodology that can be implemented on various large mechanical systems in the design stages to tackle noise and vibration problems before prototyping to significantly reduce the development costs. Bond graph transfer path analysis (TPA) is an advantageous method compared to the existing empirical TPA methodologies such as the Operational Path Analysis due to its efficient analytical nature. In this paper, bond graph TPA has been implemented on a reduced aero-engine model to determine vibration contribution at various aero-engine locations to propose structural design guidelines to minimize the vibration transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical Failure Analysis and SimulationFrench-language works237,207