MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002736750

Hubungan Antara Level Alexithymia dengan Keterampilan Interpersonal pada Remaja (Suatu Penelitian pada Siswa di SMAN 1 Peukan Bada Aceh Besar)

2019· article· id· W3002736750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faradina Muhardi, Nurbaity Bustamam

Bibliographic record

VenueJIMBK: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bimbingan & Konseling · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAlexithymiaHumanitiesSocial psychologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara level alexithymia dengan keterampilan interpersonal pada remaja. Alexithymia adalah trait kepribadian yang ditandai dengan kesulitan mengidentifikasi emosi, kesulitan mendeskripsikan emosi, dan pola pikir eksternal. Alexithymia juga berkaitan dengan disfungsi pada kesadaran emosi, kelekatan sosial dan hubungan interpersonal. Di sisi lain, keterampilan interpersonal merupakan  suatu bentuk  kemampuan maupun keahlian yang dimiliki oleh individu dalam membangun komunikasi secara efektif serta saling memahami antar individu dengan orang lain sehingga dapat terbentuk suatu hubungan yang baik dengan individu yang lainnya. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah ada hubungan negatif antara level alexithymia dengan keterampilan interpersonal pada remaja.  Penelitian dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan metode korelasi ini menggunakan Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 versi Indonesia untuk mengukur Alexithymia dan Skala Keterampilan Interpersonal untuk mengukur keterampilan interpersonal subjek. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya korelasi positif dan lemah antara kedua variabel ( r = 0.272, p = 0.001), sehingga hipotesis penulis ditolak. Kata kunci : Alexithymia , Keterampilan Interpersonal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJIMBK: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bimbingan & KonselingSame topicEducational Methods and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207