Hubungan Antara Level Alexithymia dengan Keterampilan Interpersonal pada Remaja (Suatu Penelitian pada Siswa di SMAN 1 Peukan Bada Aceh Besar)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara level alexithymia dengan keterampilan interpersonal pada remaja. Alexithymia adalah trait kepribadian yang ditandai dengan kesulitan mengidentifikasi emosi, kesulitan mendeskripsikan emosi, dan pola pikir eksternal. Alexithymia juga berkaitan dengan disfungsi pada kesadaran emosi, kelekatan sosial dan hubungan interpersonal. Di sisi lain, keterampilan interpersonal merupakan suatu bentuk kemampuan maupun keahlian yang dimiliki oleh individu dalam membangun komunikasi secara efektif serta saling memahami antar individu dengan orang lain sehingga dapat terbentuk suatu hubungan yang baik dengan individu yang lainnya. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah ada hubungan negatif antara level alexithymia dengan keterampilan interpersonal pada remaja. Penelitian dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan metode korelasi ini menggunakan Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 versi Indonesia untuk mengukur Alexithymia dan Skala Keterampilan Interpersonal untuk mengukur keterampilan interpersonal subjek. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya korelasi positif dan lemah antara kedua variabel ( r = 0.272, p = 0.001), sehingga hipotesis penulis ditolak. Kata kunci : Alexithymia , Keterampilan Interpersonal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".