MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002819866 · doi:10.7202/1067738ar

PME manufacturières créatives : le rôle des propriétaires-dirigeants

2019· article· fr· W3002819866 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cynthia Lavoie, Maripier Tremblay, Georges Abdul-Nour

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour demeurer compétitives, les PME manufacturières doivent être créatives et innovantes. Seulement certaines d’entre elles relèvent ce défi. Malgré cette importance de la créativité, elle demeure peu étudiée au sein des PME, surtout des PME manufacturières. Comme le propriétaire-dirigeant joue un rôle central dans le développement des capacités créatives de son entreprise, nous avons choisi de nous intéresser à lui. Nous avons donc étudié le cas de cinq PME manufacturières québécoises créatives. L’analyse ne nous a pas permis de dégager le profil type d’un dirigeant de PME manufacturière créative, mais a confirmé le rôle de catalyseur joué par ce dernier. Les résultats tendent également à montrer que les PME manufacturières créatives sont dirigées par des propriétaires-dirigeants à « double personnalité », c’est-à-dire ayant une capacité d’ambidextérité. C’est ce qui expliquerait en grande partie pourquoi certaines PME manufacturières peuvent être qualifiées de créatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entrepriseSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207