MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002868151 · doi:10.33583/mags2019.01

Provenance Studies of the Ballast Stones found in the North Bay of Tel Dor, Israel

2020· report· en· W3002868151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda Holdeman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Haifa
KeywordsProvenanceBayBallastGeologyGeographyEnvironmental scienceOceanographyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ancient trade ship's stability was influenced by presence of ballast stones, loaded and unloaded varying with cargo densities. The result of this variability is an ancient harbour's collection of discarded and saved ballast stones, with origins reflecting a ship's route. Both Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and thinsection petrography were used jointly on ballast stones collected from the North Bay of Tel Dor, Israel, to identify their origins. This is a new approach to study geological artifacts.. With proposed origins of non-local ballast stones, further assertions of seafaring interactions between Tel Dor and surrounding regions can be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207